Click here for Chinese

  

Chapters:

Animal Experimentation

Clothing and Cosmetic Animals

Companion Animals

Endangered and Abused Animals and TCM

Entertainment Animals - Zoos, Circuses, Rodeos, etc.

Fishing

Food and Medicine Animals

Horse and Greyhound Racing

Humane Education

Hunting

Legislation

Traction Animals

Vegetarianism and Veganism

Zoos

Contacts and Links to Organisations

Bibliography and Links to General Info

Archives


 
 
 
 
 

 

Asian Animal Protection Network
Asian Animal Protection Network

The Zoo Pages   
Reports compiled by Dr John Wedderburn.
         Running Leopard      

"Keep Wildlife in the Wild - NOT in high security prisons!!"

"The cruel wild beast is not behind the bars of the cage. He stands in front of it." (Axel Munthe)

Zoopage 1

This list of zoos is alphabetical by Country, then City:
Chinese zoos A- H (Beijing to Hong Kong) on this page; 
Chinese zoos J - Z (Jiaozuo to Zigong) on Zoopage 2;  
Other Countries on Zoopage 3
 

Introduction
This is a list of the zoos we have visited in the last few years . Our remit is China and South East Asia but we have included other zoos for purposes of comparison.

Chinese zoos come under the authority of the State Forestry Administration which delegates the regulation of zoos to the China Wildlife Conservation Association .

A comprehensive survey of the zoos of each country is vitally needed but no one has the resources to carry this out. Legislative control of zoos that would be a consequence of such a survey is therefore years down the line. If you visit any zoos in the region, we would be very pleased to hear an account of your visit.

For more information on zoos go to:
Entertainment Animals

Nothing here is copyright and attribution is not necessary but please don't misquote us or take the comments out of context.
Anyone wishing to use the original AAPN photographs on this site is welcome to do so - but we suggest contacting us first because in most cases we have a high quality original.  The quality presented here is a compromise for faster loading.


Beijing
, PRC.

I visited the Beijing Zoo in 1978, 1994 and in March and June 1996. It is a beautiful park full of mature trees and miserable animals - but not as bad as most Chinese zoos - certainly better than Guilin, Qingdao, Guangzhou, etc.

It is very large with an extensive collection of "exhibits". But every cage is a small concrete box. In 1978 I remember large areas of grass and trees with animals wandering about - but that's all gone - the animal areas are entirely concreted over. The human areas are all clean and well cared for but the animal areas are not good. No attempts whatsoever at enrichment. Many, many examples of stereotypic behaviour, many in frantic motion. 3 pandas - 2 sleeping, 1 pacing (feet being placed in exact position on each circuit). Giraffes looked in good condition but just a small concrete room. The elephants were not only confined in single very small rooms but also chained. Gorillas slumped in despond. Kangaroos lying miserably in small concrete rooms. Monkeys with bad skin disease. But the animals were generally in much better health than at other Chinese zoos. What I remember most about my visit in June 1978 was the obvious empathy between animals, keepers and visitors - a sort of symbiosis between keepers and animals, everyone poor but helping each other to make the best of life. No such feeling now. People shouting at and poking the animals to get reactions and laughing at zoochotic behaviour. I was interested to see a crate in the anteroom of the tiger house labelled "Tigers from Gerry Cottle's Circus, London". There was a nocturnal animal house - a low light hall lined with cages of frantically pacing small mammals - civets, lemurs, loris, etc., etc. The animals to have your photo taken with were all, thank goodness, artificial. No animal performances.

A much more thorough review of Beijing zoos can be found in the International Zoo News - Jan/Feb 2001.

 Ying Ying
 

Changsha, Hunan Province, PRC.
This from the Global Zoo Directory (their report must be quite old):

Changsha Zoological Garden
   
Changsha, Hunan
CHINA

Director: Tan Xiannu
Head Vets:
Phone: *23-989
Fax:
E-mail:
Website:

 
Attendance Area Staff Associations
2000000 5 84

 
  Species Specimen
Mammals 45 104
Birds 41 942
Reptiles 2 2
Amphibians 2 2
Fish 0 0
Invertebrates 0 0

AAPN REPORT:
Tel: 0731 96588
Visited in January 2004, two days before Lunar New Year. The zoo is situated in one corner of a series of city centre parks. I believe this is a municipal zoo: www.cstax.gov.cn

Weather overcast, cold (just over zero C), windless and grey.
Changsha ("Long Sand" - referring to a long sand bank in the middle of the river) is a city of 3m people on the main Beijing to Hong Kong line.  It is the capital of Hunan ("South of the Lake") Province which has a population of 60m (similar to UK).
The zoo was busy with well over a 1000 visitors - mainly families with old folk and children, many young couples.  Unlike most Chinese zoos, the zoo has not preserved much of the park it was built on.  Most of its areas have been used up by construction of animal houses.
Entrance is a modest RMB10 (just over US$1) and includes entrance to the dolphinarium, circus, bird show and two aquaria, as well as all the animal houses. The House of Horrors was extra as were all the concessions - souvenir shops (hot items were dolphin balloons), snack bars, roundabouts, bumper cars, horse riding, goat cart riding, photography with horses, goats, seals, dolphins.
The "exhibits" are without exception basic, bare, primitive, featureless and dank.    Rows and rows of identical menagerie style concrete and iron cages housing miserable zoochotic animals.  Many of the animals are living in a constant state of fear and there is no effort made to stop the visitors from harassing the animals.  Indeed, as in other less developed areas, every male visitor seems to feel obliged to provoke a reaction from every animal he passes.
Security and supervision were almost non-existent.  Padlocks off, gates into security areas open, children running unchecked inside the security zones, people throwing food and other objects at the animals and shouting at them.
It was clean and tidy compared with many Chinese zoos but there was no attempt anywhere at any form of enrichment either in cage design or apparatus.  The cages were uniformly featureless and dank with no possibility of privacy provided.


The first line of cages, stretching for about 100 metres, is for birds - a huge variety of species crammed into rectangular cages about 3 x 3 x 3m.
There are small open concrete and mud patches for camels, deer and a zebra.
The dolphinarium is a major feature with four shows each day by 2 seals and 4 dolphins.
The holding tanks for the dolphins is pitifully small (about 10m radius) - especially when compared with the Ocean Park dolphinarium in Hong Kong which we visited the previous month. Indeed our conversation with the Ocean Park Director was very relevant - we told her that, yes, your facilities are pretty good but we object to your dolphinarium in principle because the basic money making formula is being copied by people who do not share the same welfare and ethical standards.  The whole idea is morally wrong.
The main pool is about 25 x 40m.
The two seals went through a routine of clapping, counting, vocalising, barrel balancing, ball balancing, throwing frisbees into the crowd, spinning, playing the piano (Frère Jacques) and clashing cymbals.
Two dolphins then did jumping, dancing, vocalising, retrieving rings, spinning rings, flipping balls into the crowd with their tails.  The other two dolphins were just used for photo opportunities (extra payment) as the crowd filed out. The seals were also there to be photographed with children sitting beside them.

Circus:
The audience loved this show, their faces wreathed in smiles, not the slightest thought that there might be anything wrong with what they were watching.
1. Lion and tiger walking over climbing frame.
2. 3 baby moon bears jumping hurdles, riding rubber balls, walking tightrope, somersaulting on tightrope, walking on hands on tightrope.
3. Goat balancing and spinning on tightrope with monkey doing handstands on her back.
4. Piglet running to heel, jumping through hoops, picking characters for colours shouted out by audience.
5. 3 Macaques riding bicycles.
6. 6 toy dogs (Shitzu, Pekinese, etc) jumping through turnstile hoops, pushing barrels, jumping hurdles, seesawing.
7. Macaque shooting hoops, riding a ball over seesaw.
8. 2 baby moon bears:
boxing (controlled by trainers pulling their hair)
skipping with trainers
shooting hoops
balancing on plank on barrel, rotating pole
riding bicycles
riding motorbike
lying on backs rotating burning poles.
9. Tiger and lion riding a barrel, the tiger jumping through a burning hoop.

The Chamber of Freaks was free of charge:
In the first room, a cow with a fifth leg, a goat with 3 legs - standing tethered. Also a dog with 3 legs, a monkey with one arm and a coypu in tiny, body-sized cages.  I couldn't see what was freakish about the coypu, probably some deformity but it was not obvious. The second room had dead deformed animals - preserved in jars or stuffed - frogs, dogs, fish, bats, etc.

The Bird Show presented birds of the parrot family pulling carts, shooting hoops, etc.

The House of Horrors was an extra RMB3 - a darkened cavern with moanings, groanings, roarings, growlings and screamings, vibrating floor and moving models - dinosaurs, gorillas, corpse rising from a coffin, people with animal heads, etc, etc.  Personally I found the exhibits outside far more horrifying.  Especially the piteous mewing of the lions.

Chimpanzee House:
An absolutely disgraceful exhibit.
I have never before seen two such miserable and dejected animals.  They are kept separate. Each has 6 x 4m  featureless concrete behind steel mesh and glass (photography impossible). No attempt at enrichment. A few apples lying around.
There is an outside area about twice the size with one small climbing frame to which they did not have access today at least.  Anyhow it would have been too cold - it was already cold enough inside.
Both were huddled against the connecting double door as if trying to reach the other. The keeper came in with a cigarette in his mouth - he clapped and jumped up and down at the female who then reluctantly got up and slowly shuffled over to the feeding door. Then she started stomping with her feet and shaking the iron doors - repetitively and continuously for a long period. The visitors loved this and were shouting at the chimpanzees and laughing.

Baboons and gibbons were also behind glass and difficult to see and even more difficult to photograph - cold, dank cells with no ropes, climbing frames or any attempt at enrichment.

Lots of macaques - labelled as different species but most seemed to be hybrids.

First aquarium:
Some crocodiles overcrowded in bath tub like boxes. Lots of snakes in glass boxes.

Second aquarium:
Walls lined with small water tanks with different fish.

Hippo House - all concrete.
Two giraffes.
A large Asian elephant behind glass, difficult to see. There was an small concrete and mud paddock outside with some stadium seats but no other sign of an elephant show.

A lake in the middle of the zoo with pelican, geese, ducks, etc.
Black swans and flamingos in an open pen.

Bear pit with two moon bears begging for food.
A pit for lesser pandas.

A second long line of menagerie cages housed several tigers (including a white tiger and two sets of tiger children), several lions and a couple of brown bears (miserably pacing).

A third long row of menagerie cages housed:
clouded leopard
northern lynx
coypus
4 leopards
porcupines
cougar
foxes, very distressed, pacing madly and crying
wolves pacing frantically.

Just down the road from the zoo is a Bird Park with a large aviary - but it was closed.  Something to do with Avian Flu??

Click here for the photos.

Visited again in April 2007 to accompany a Sky News team.
Sky News - China's Zoos: 'Asylums For Animals'
This zoo is still as disgraceful as before. Nothing has improved. The freak show animals are still all there, the circus acts haven't changed. One of the brown bears is gone, the tiger children have grown up. The psychotic animals are still all there with no attempt at doing anything about them. The female chimpanzee is the worst case of Zoochosis that it has been my misfortune to witness.  The male is probably just as distressed but he just sits there.  She screams, strikes doors, bangs her head against the floor, hits herself repeatedly - altogether a most piteous sight. And the worst thing - the visitors can see nothing wrong with it. And this was the "state of the art" facility that the Ugandan Wildlife Commission was going to send chimpanzees to! Fortunately they changed their minds!

 

Changzhou, Jiangsu Province, PRC.
Hung Mei Garden Zoo,
visited April 1998. Typical Chinese zoo - small featureless cages in a beautiful park setting behind a temple.
2 tigers, 4 leopards, 3 raccoons. 3 wolves, 4 ostriches, 1 lioness, 1 american black bear, 1 american brown bear, 2 asian moon bears (one bald), 3 wombats sharing their cage and food with rats, 3 cats, 1 beaver, 1 lynx, a monkey mountain and assorted birds. Also a small building (2 yuan extra) with snakes and alligators in tiny compartments.  And the worst feature - a small building (3 yuan extra) with a seal in a small bath, 2 monkeys in tiny cages, a turtle, some snakes and a dead foetus in a jar.
Photos.

Chengdu, Sichuan Province, PRC.
For photos, click this paw:
                                            Paw
In September 1997 I travelled to Chengdu to investigate the Sun and Moon South West Theme Park but also visited the Giant Panda Breeding Research Station and the Chengdu Zoo. Chengdu is the capital of a province with 100,000,000 people.

1. Sun and Moon. The animal abusive acts had stopped because, as the Manager explained, "There were too many complaints". Well done, Joe Public!

2. Giant Panda Breeding Research Station. This is a noble effort but judging by the statistics it seems doomed to failure. The conditions that I saw were quite good by zoo standards but I understand from a friend who had access to parts that were out of bounds to me that some of the experimental conditions are not so pleasant.  Unfortunately they have not been sufficiently successful to have a self perpetuating colony and, to keep up the numbers that they need for research, they may have to continue to capture wild pandas.

It seems obvious to me that the problem is not going to be solved by fancy test tube techniques.

What in fact they are proving is that the only way to save this species is to conserve its natural habitat. I fear that it will take them a long time before they will admit this, far less achieve the necessary protection of the wild areas.

Meanwhile the business men are getting on with their business of making profits. The destruction of the species is ensured because there is a sufficient number of business people and officials in high places who do not consider the panda to be of importance. They will likely deliver a fait accompli while the world talks. I hope I am wrong.

Second Visit - on Tuesday 13th November 2001.
T
he sun was shining and the Pandas were gambolling in the trees and grass - thus we absorbed a generally more upbeat feeling about the place than on our last visit.
   

3. Chengdu Zoo.
A fairly standard Chinese provincial zoo. A large well laid out park with lots of amusements for the throngs of people. The animals are housed in small featureless concrete and iron blocks and are subjected to constant harassment by the public; shouting, spitting, throwing food and all sorts of unsuitable objects. There is no attempt at providing privacy or environmental enrichment.

The elephant barn was one of the best I have seen. The dog section was one of the worst ; each animal in a square metre concrete house with a tiny wooden platform as the only feature.

The rhinoceros exhibit was poignant; new and unoccupied. You may remember that the San Diego zoo gifted two rhinos to Chengdu in the summer of 1996; they perished of heat exhaustion on the overland journey from Shanghai. I have to comment that the new rhino house was far too small for such large mammals; they would not have had a worthwhile life had they completed the journey.

I visited again in December, 1997 mainly to check stories that the Zoo had put a stuffed rhino on display. But as far as I could see the rhino house was still completely empty.

We visited again in November, 2001. The rhino house now has a resident white rhino and 5 zebras. The dog section has fortunately disappeared - in its place is a small petting zoo.

Other animals include the following:

  • 2 hippos.
  • 2 mongolian wild asses.
  • 2 thin male lions; 1 female lion - all the cats having shockingly bad cages.
  • 3 siberian tigers (one with calluses worn on cheeks from bar rubbing).
  • 3 jaguars, 2 melanotic.
  • 2 adult leopards; 2 x 18 month olds; 5 x 6 month olds in 3 separate cages; 1 kept solitary - looked unwell.
  • 1 large chimp; 1 small chimp - shockingly inadequate cages for all the great apes.
  • 2 orangutans housed separately, desperately trying to get back into sleeping quarters.
  • 2 gnus plus child.
  • 2 pandas; 2 lesser pandas.
  • 2 elephants - adult female stereotypically bobbing and swaying.
  • 1 mad boar pacing frantically in new glass fronted small cage.
  • lynx and others in the new pathetic cages.
  • capuchins, gibbons, golden monkeys.
  • lamas, deer, goral, ostriches, addax, goats, horses, camels, takins, yak.
  • 5 blue sheep.
  • polar bear, sun bear, moon bear (already in sleeping quarters so not seen).
  • rabbits, ducks.
  • a variety of monkeys.

From Global Zoo Directory:
Chengdu Zoological Gardens
Chengdu 610081, Sichuan
CHINA
Telephone: 86-28-332-4661 Fax: 86-28-333-5872

Attendance # Staff Area Associations
2500000 282 16  
  # Species # Specimens
Mammals 81 301
Birds 146 1743
Reptiles 3 5
Amphibians 1 3
Fish 1 704
Invertebrates 0 0
Totals 232 2756

Visited again in June 2007.
No substantive change. Money has obviously been available as many of the unacceptable menagerie cages have been replaced by new cages BUT OF THE SAME SPECIFICATION AS THE OLD ones.  Being new they are easier to clean and more robust but just as unacceptable from the point of view of animal welfare. It is obvious that the keepers and the visitors still have a primitive view of non-human animals, and no respect for the inmates except for their ability to perform demeaning tricks. Very depressing.


4. Chengdu Wild World at Jintang.
60km north-west of Chengdu.
This will not be open until December 2001 but we were kindly allowed to drive through the safari park section. The animals were already in their night quarters but had not yet been released in the paddocks. There were separate paddocks for Tigers, Bears, Lions and Wolves.  Inside the Bear paddock were 3 empty bile bear farming cages and 2 empty bile bear transport cages. There will also be exhibits of Deer, Elephants, Zebras, Monkeys, Dogs, Foxes and there will be 4 Giant Pandas. 3000 animals, 300 species. Area 1 x 5 sq Km. There was a large stadium structure - we could not ascertain its function.

For Chengdu Photos, click here.

For more information on Sichuan Province, see:
Sichuan November 2001


Dalian,
(Dairen, Luda, Lushun, Port Arthur, Dalniy), Liaoning Province, PRC.
Tel: Dalian 249 5072 or 248 3574.

A port city on roughly the same latitude as, and half way between, Beijing and Seoul. Population about 5 million. I visited in November, 1997.

The old zoo has been closed and a huge new one constructed taking up the whole of a valley on one of the hills just outside the city. Different exhibits are up different side valleys. So there is lots of space and the area is most attractive. Unfortunately, as usual, all the consideration has been given to the human perspective with little regard for the interests of the inmates - they are still "exhibited" (exposed) in tiny concrete and iron cages.

A monorail takes you up from the main to entrance to the main hub for the side valleys.   I had hoped that the train would take me round the zoo in the same fashion as the monorail at the San Diego Wild Animal Park.

Up the main side valley is a conventional small zoo with greater and lesser pandas, alligators, aviaries, a children's petting zoo, various deer, monkeys, etc and a dolphinarium/aquarium (not yet opened). Up another side valley are zebras, giraffes and camels. Up the main valley are an elephant house with a performance area outside it but no sign of an elephant; a primate house; bears, tigers, lions; and a permanent circus area.

On the first afternoon I just had time to look at the first valley - it was all very modern and really not bad as zoos go - not unpleasant apart from the biting cold wind.

I went back the next day and saw some horrors.

The bears were overcrowded in exposed concrete shelves and were displaying classic stereotypic movements - very distressed and distressing. Many of the monkeys were also out of their minds.

There were snow leopards, a wolf and a lynx in new, clean but hopelessly small, featureless and exposed cages. I watched a man take a swig of water in his mouth and spit it over the already terrified wolf - he looked at me in complete surprise when I swore at him, obviously having no idea that he had done anything wrong. As so often in Chinese zoos every spectator felt it necessary to stimulate a reaction from each animal by banging, shouting, throwing things and spitting. In this zoo, the staff were all doing this too - apparently just to pass their time.

An interesting feature of the lion exhibit is that it has a fenced off section for two terrified goats.

The tiger exhibit was better than many. In with the tigers were four dogs. My initial thought - remembering the Xili Lake Zoo's policy of selling live chickens to the public to throw to the tigers - was omigod, this must be lunch! But no, apparently the dogs had been given to a lactating tiger and had grown up as part of the family. They seemed to enjoy each other's company.

Far and away the worst part of the zoo is the Circus. Unfortunately I just missed the morning show so I hung around freezing until the afternoon show which was then cancelled because of the weather. But I was able to photograph the animals in their beast wagons which were their permanent quarters. The cages give them room only to stand up and turn round - they don't even get the comfort of psychotic pacing. The cages are outdoors with no shelter. The bears had rings through their noses or lips as at Xili Lake. See Photographs.

 

Fuzhou, Fujian Province, PRC

I was in Fuzhou on 18 Jan 1997. This is the capital city of Fujian Province. I had been there a couple of times before but had not had time to go to the zoo. I would describe the zoo as about average for a Chinese zoo in all respects. Its area was small but it was attractively situated on the side of a little hill. The busiest attractions were the children's train and various underground horror shows.  All cages dirty plain concrete and iron boxes with no imagination used. Zero attempts at enrichment. Lots of litter. Many of the animals were in travelling cages within the cage. No attempt was being made to stop the people from throwing food, plastic bags, cigarette ends etc at the animals and laughing hilariously at the animals' responses. Everywhere stereotypy and misery. Cages were mostly a standard 2 x 4 metres.

There were 2 elephants (unchained and in reasonable though bored condition), 3 pacing tigers, 2 moon bears, 1 lioness with cub, 1 begging brown bear in a pit, 2 chimps, 7 crowded camels, 4 porcupines, 5 vultures, 1 leopard cat, innumerable birds and monkeys, 3 ponies, 2 yaks, one boar, several raccoons and goats, 4 sheep, 15 deer, 2 leopards (one with a skin disease), 2 silver foxes, 2 each of two other varieties of the cat family, 1 coypu, 2 really pathetic wolves in a tiny space, several small aquaria and a reptile and amphibian house. The dog area, sponsored by Pedigree, was a shocker.

In the streets of Fuzhou there were hawkers openly selling wild animal skins.

There were advertisements in my hotel by the local Tourist Bureau promoting fishing and the hunting of bear ("bares") and deer; complete with a colour picture of a bleeding deer.

This is the entry from the Global Zoo Directory.

Fuzhou Giant Panda Research Center
Fuzhou 350001, Fujian Province, CHINA
Telephone: 86-591-372-6522 Fax: 86-591-372-5099

Species  Specimens
Birds        36         131
Mammals     51         702
Reptiles     1             6
Amphibians     0           0
Fish        20     20,000
Invertebrates     0             0
Totals   108  20,839

I visited the Fuzhou Zoo again in November 1997.
Just as bad if not worse. The Pedigree signs have been removed from the dog exhibits. While I was very much against the idea of Pedigree sponsoring such horrors, it does seem that the dogs are now less well nourished. There was one Dalmatian desperately struggling to obtain affection through the glass front of his cage, hardly able to stand because of gross deformity by rickets.

The two wolf exhibit is now only one. The remaining one is an awful state of constant fear.

All the animals were in a state of constant fear. Practically every visitor shouted and banged to watch the fright reaction.

For photos, click here (November 1997).

From China Daily - 10th November 1999
FUZHOU (Xinhua) _ A goat exerts its utmost strength trying to escape from the claws of a giant tiger, but in vein (sic), and becomes the colourful cat's meal at the end of the race. This is not a scene from a Disney cartoon. Instead it is an everyday occurrence at a tiger research centre in Meihua Mountain, in Fujian Province, a coastal province facing Taiwan across the straits. Local researchers believe that after years of efforts, Meihua Mountain may regain its past reputation as the ancestral home and the most favourable habitat for the South China Tiger, also known as the Chinese Tiger or the Xiamen Tiger.
The number of tigers, which were previously widely seen in the eastern, southern and southwestern parts of the country, has declined drastically in the past decades due to rampant human activities, including hunting and lumbering. 
Currently, it is estimated that 20 to 30 South China Tigers are living in the wild, while 53 are living in captivity. The tiger has been listed among the most endangered animals as its number is far less than that of the giant panda, which stands at around 1,000.
Since the early 1990s, China has began to explore ways to protect the rare species, in close collaboration with several international organizations concerned. 
Last year, a South China Tiger salvation programme was launched and the research centre was established in Meihua Mountain to help the big cat recover its capabilities to live in the wild in addition to padding the count. 
To date, 1.5 million yuan (US$180,000) has been spent on the project, primarily on infrastructure, according to scientists working at the centre. 
Presently, the three seed tigers introduced for breeding from a zoo in Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, in September last year, have grown accustomed to their new home in Meihua Mountain. 
The tigers now weigh approximately 150 kilograms each, and are now ready for reproduction. 

I visited again in December 2004.
Unfortunately my photos got lost in a computer crash, or perhaps they just dissolved in shame at what they were portraying.  I was absolutely disgusted this time by the Fuzhou Zoo. It is awful. Full of miserable animals living in wretched conditions. A shame on China!



Gaoxiong,
ROC.

This southern city of Taiwan, also spelled Kaohsiung, is one of the world's busiest ports. I visited the Long Life Mountain Public Garden (Shousan Park) - commonly known as the "Shou Shan Zoo" - in May 1996. It was a beautiful early summer day. The zoo is closed every Monday but I found the Director who gave me permission to visit. Unfortunately I didn't have time to talk with him or even get his name as he was driving out to have a day off. My feeling about the zoo may have been improved by the good weather and the lack of people.

It is a fairly new zoo, much smaller than the Taipei one, quite well designed from a human point of view and certainly much better designed than London or Guangzhou zoos. It has been built in one corner of a rehabilitation scheme of a disused stone quarry which had destroyed half a mountain.  Far too much concrete but the animals had more space than in the menagerie zoos and there was plenty of use of trees and shrubs for screening, shade and general interest. As high security prisons go, not too bad. The animals were mostly in concrete floored pits surrounded by artificial rock. They generally looked healthy, clean and well nourished. I did not observe any stereotypic behaviour. One of the tigers jumped up at me when I got close and seemed to enjoy the game. An elephant took obvious delight in throwing leaves and small stones at me. The pythons were presumably happy to have live chickens sharing their cage. The chickens seemed happy foraging for food, apparently unaware of their cell mates. I had the feeling that all the animals were enjoying a quiet day after a noisy Sunday. The keepers seemed to have a good attitude towards the animals. One lady was hosing and brushing the sealions with obvious pleasure all round.

The only time that Virginia McKenna's adjective "unacceptable" leaped to my tongue was at the last minute in a small building just beside the exit gate. There were three tiny totally featureless cages which I would have thought to be temporary holding cages if it was not for the permanent sign posts attached to them. In here were a gibbon, a binturong and two rabbits.

Note (March 2000): The Shou Shan Zoo has signed  an agreement of cooperation with South Africa's Pretoria Zoo.  Will good or ill come of that?

The night before, I visited the Lioho Night market where there were many hawkers selling puppies, cats, baby civets, rabbits, etc.. Also distressing to a vegetarian were the piles of hearts, kidneys, livers, guts, etc. waiting to be cooked for hungry passers by. Fortunately I did not see any manacled orangutans - I believe they are a thing of the past - let's hope so.

100 kilometres North of Kaohsiung, in fact just North West of Tainan, is the Leopard King Safari Zoo.  This is a new and pleasingly unambitious animal collection.   It is obviously designed to make money but it has plenty of good educational stuff and no harrowing exhibits.  Most of the animals are in square featureless paddocks but, apart from some holding cages at the back and the reptile house (the worst "exhibit" is the Komodo Dragon), no menagerie type enclosures. It is not what we have come to think of as a safari park - the animals are not roaming. Visitors walk rather than drive but for an extra fee they can go round in a horse drawn carriage. There is an elephant which performs tricks and there is a show which features such things as birds flying out of a burst balloon. But there are no big cats, bears or primates or the other animals which most hate captivity. Some giraffes, zebras and camels (which have pegs through their faces and can be ridden for a fee).  There are lots of ostriches - I think they are planning ostrich rides too.
Many interesting trees and shrubs have been planted - with maturity the gardens will be very fine.
Tel: + 886 6781 0000  Fax: + 886 6781 0460
Photos

 

Guangzhou, Guangdong, PRC.

Guangzhou Zoo. Tel 777 5574 or 775 2702

My first visit was in 1978 - I remember then that I thought it generally better than the Edinburgh Zoo despite many rusting cages and flea-bitten, malnourished animals. I visited again in 1994 and noted that it had a small wretched circus area, the big apes looked miserable but the elephants and the kangaroos had much more room than is usual - and all the cells were clean and the animals looked physically healthy. One of the elephants knew how to break open bottles of mineral water, swallowing the water and spitting out the bottle.

I visited again on Wednesday 1st May 1996. It was a Public Holiday and the Zoo was very crowded until a major thunderstorm and downpour half way through the afternoon drove most of the people away. Many new cages had been added since my last visit. All have been designed with absolutely no consideration for the animal's natural habitat. The only considerations appear to be hygiene and visibility to the public. The cages are uniformly bleak with concrete walls and floors and iron bars. There is usually an open wooden box as sleeping quarters. Most of the animals that were not sleeping were showing distressing signs of Zoochosis. Some of the tigers, in particular, were harrowingly demented. One bear had calluses on its face caused by stereotypic rubbing. The cage next to this bear was bizarrely stuffed full of live chickens.

The good things that can be said about this zoo are that the park is beautiful with some fine mature trees; the animals and their cages are quite clean; and, despite it being a busy day, the amount of litter was not as bad as in some zoos; the elephants were not chained, at least during my visit; and there was no live animal photography area. Unfortunately a long tree and shrub lined avenue that I had enjoyed last time is now a building site.

And there was, very unfortunately, a performance area. There was an additional charge US$0.8 to enter this "circus ring". The sheltered part of the auditorium was crowded, probably because of the rain - certainly the audience did not seem to be very interested in the show. The youths conducting the show were obviously very bored and communicated this to the audience. The animals when not performing are confined to tiny body sized cages in a grotto at the back of the stage. The show takes about forty five minutes and is followed by a fifteen minute break before the cycle is repeated. The animals could not be said to be in good condition but they were not as sick as I have seen in other zoo circuses. There was no attempt at either audience participation or educational messages.

During the interval the loudspeaker blasts Cantopop. Then a bell rings, the lights come on, a girl shouts into the microphone and the Cantopop is replaced by blaring circus type music.

The acts:

A tiger walks round the ring, a youth cracks a whip on its hide, it gets up onto one of three stools and steps from one to the other and back again, then the youth shakes its hand and it walks off.

Four small dogs jump hurdles, roll over and jump through a hoop.

Next there is much shouting, growling and cage banging from behind the scenes to impress the audience that a very fierce animal is about to enter. A small lioness, edentulous and declawed, eventually emerges and leans over a large metal ball, growling when poked with the whip handle - this goes on for several distressing minutes.

A goat is made to walk back and forth across a series of uprights.

A tiger comes out pulling a small cart in which sits a bored young lady waving plastic flowers. A young man cracks a whip at the tiger.

A dog balances on a ball then walks on hindlegs.

A pony walks round the ring with a lion on a platform on its back. Then a tiger gets on to the platform in the place of the lion. Then a monkey - the audience liked this act, the first time they had showed appreciation. Lots of whip cracking.

A small moon bear with a string attached to a ring through its upper lip lies on its back twirling a stick on its four paws, then stands on a plank balancing on a rolling log.

A monkey pulls a cart then pushes a wheelbarrow then balances on a ball rolling it over a seesaw; then repeats the performance carrying an umbrella.

Another monkey does the plank balancing on a rolling log trick then rides a bicycle. The youth cracks the whip but does not hit the monkey.

A pair of monkeys ride bicycles - the audience enjoys this.

A pair of tigers have a brief boxing match then slide down a chute.

I then tried to visit the pedigree dog area but I was not allowed in as it was after 5.0pm. Displays of domestic animals in Chinese zoos are now, unfortunately, common. The animals have no contact with others of their kind or humans except through the bars. They are fed on congee. The petfood manufacturer IAMS was supplying dog and cat food to the Guangzhou Zoo but withdrew when they discovered that their products were being sold to pet shops and the animals were continuing to be fed congee. The zoo is now supplied by Pedigree.

I inspected a very large building site behind the Main Gate and discovered that this will be a Dolphinarium. (Every Chinese Municipality is getting one of these). During the heavy rain there was a major run off of topsoil from the herbivores' cages.

On 18th January, 1997 I paid my nth visit to the Guangzhou zoo. Nothing much to report. The Hong Kong jaguar children are pacing like pros. The performance area is continuing; I was particularly upset by the performing goat which when not on duty stands in a pen with its face in a dark corner obviously terrified of the beasts of prey surrounding it. The other performance animals spend their time stereotyping or sleeping in the usual travelling size cages. The construction of the dolphinarium is progressing well. I copied from a notice board that Guangzhou Zoo is "one of the largest in China, built in 1958, 43.3 hectares with 400 animals from 400 species.
[Note: one of the Hong Kong jaguar children died of diarrhoea in Nanning Zoo in early 1998]

Visited again in July 2005.
Above remarks still apply. A disgraceful zoo.

To help to do something about this zoo, please join this forum:
save_the_zoo_animals : Save the Animals in Guangzhou Zoo, China


Guilin, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, PRC.

The Guilin Zoo is typical of many in the minor towns of China. We first visited it in 1994. It is situated in a beautiful park (the Seven Star Park - so called because it has limestone karsts in the formation of the Plough) - but the housing conditions are awful. Miserable shabby unhealthy looking animals. On the way back from the zoo we came across a dog slaughterhouse which was extremely harrowing.

We visited again, ten years later, in April 2004. The park has generally been greatly cleaned up and is quite delightful - except for the wretched animal cages which still persist in dark corners. It is high time the authorities closed the zoo part of this otherwise magnificent park.  The entire dog slaughterhouse street has been demolished.

Xiongsen Bear and Tiger Mountain Village
This animal collection has been notorious for years for its callous cruelty - for reports, click here. We visited in April 2004 and were very happy to report that the live feeding had apparently stopped.  The park was severely dilapidated and appeared to be being run down.

April 2007. Recent reports reveal that this tiger and bear farm is prospering beyond all belief. See report.


Guiyang
, Guizhou Province, PRC.

Kim Ling Park Zoo is another typical miserable hell hole which should be a matter of shame for China and should be closed at once and the animals sent somewhere with better conditions.  Visited August 1999. The Park itself is quite lovely, there is no need to ruin it by the addition of concrete and iron and wretched animals. Most of the cages were 4 x 4 metre structures of decaying mouldy concrete and rusting iron. Faeces and food scraps lay mixed on the cage floors.

There was a poor little frightened sunbear in a dank hole of a cage. Six tigers with very little room to move and nothing to do.  Two male and two female lions.
Many caged birds and different kinds of deer and ox. A porcupine, a baboon, civets, 3 vultures, assorted monkeys including the usual macaques and what I think were Francois Langurs Presbytis francoisi or Delacour's Langurs Trachypithecus delacouri.  Please have a look at the Photos.

On the way back from the zoo I came across a dog restaurant with dogs in tiny cages awaiting slaughter at the next patron's request.

Haikou, Hainan Island, PRC.

Four Zoos.

1. Hainan Dongshan Hu Wild Animal Park. (South Sea East Mountain Lake Wild Animal Park). Visited 31st March, 1997, February 1999 and 22nd August 2003.
Dongshan County, Qiongshan City, Hainan Island.
Tel: + 86 898 8536218 or + 86 898 8540819
Fax: + 86 898 8542206
Town office: 5/F A Deprex Building, Gua Mao North Road, Haikou City 570125, China.
Tel: + 86 898 6760206
Manager: Mi Kesui.

This is one of the new Chinese Safari Parks. It is one of the best animal facility in China. It is simple, unambitious, clean, well run and has few add-on horrors like photography or performance areas.

It lies about one hour's driving South of Haikou, the principal city of Hainan Island. The countryside immediately outside the relatively prosperous city of Haikou is traditional and very poor, windswept and gently undulating - rice paddies, maize, vegetables, fruit trees (durian, jack-fruit, laichee, longan, papaya, banana, Indian almond), dry stone walls, water buffaloes pulling ploughs, women bent double planting rice. The Park, and its neighbouring golf course, obviously supply a good source of employment for the local community. Most visitors go there by tourist coach (arranged by China International Travel Service) but I hired a taxi which cost about US$25. Entrance fee is 50 Yuan per passenger, no charge for the vehicle. There did not appear to be any attempt to inform drivers of rules and certainly no enforcement of common sense behaviour. My driver almost knocked down an old blind tiger. At another time he misunderstood my request to back up, and started to get out of the car within two metres of a pride of lions.

There were double gates between each section - but at most of them discipline was poor and both gates were open at once to facilitate the rapid transit of the tourist coaches and dark windowed limousines. The roads were not paved. The land was flat, surrounded by an immense stone wall and planted with Eucalypts, Acacias, Evodia, etc.

Different sections contained tigers, lions, moon bears, David's deer, sika deer, emu, ostrich, different kinds of horses, camels. These were all in open forest but the giraffe and the zebra were in smaller enclosures so that you could get out and touch them. The two Asian elephants, a larger and a smaller female were in a large moated compound - they had obviously been chained for long years in previous inadequate accommodation as they stood in a corner bobbing and swaying as if still chained. The track finally led to monkey mountain where there was a car park (when I was there, there were 6 cars and 22 coaches) and toilets, drinks, etc. The unusual feature of this monkey mountain was that the public was allowed to go through the gate and mingle with the animals.

All in all, I was pleased to see the animals being able to roam about without bars and cages. Of course, the fields could do with being bigger.

On the way back the driver took me to Stone Mountain - I would not recommend this diversion unless you are into eating mutton or hiring cheap prostitutes.

HAISAFEL.jpg (219392 bytes)

Visited again in February 1999. Standards appear to have been maintained. My only major criticism is the lack of supervision of the drivers.  My own taxi driver had great fun driving at speed up to the animals and blaring his horn.

Visited again in August 2003. It is still one of the best zoos around but management standards are being lowered.  Live chickens are on sale for visitors to feed to the lions, tigers and crocodiles. And many new miserably designed menagerie cages are being built in the forest. Photos.

2. Haikou People's Park Zoo. Visited first on 1st April, 1997.
Telephone: + 86 898 676 6826

This miserable little zoo is tucked in a corner of a pleasant park in the heart of Haikou, surrounded with big trees. The decaying iron and concrete cages are arranged in a rectangle. The first thing that hits you is the stench. The cages are a standard 3 square metres; 5 surfaces mouldy, featureless concrete; one side rusting bars or wire netting. The wretched in-mates are: two unresponsive domestic cats (one with severe skin disease), one Chinese alligator, two porcupines, one terrified rabbit, four capybara, one python, two more alligators, one owl surrounded with bird shit (Bubo bubo), five owls (Tyto), two moon bears pacing in a double cage which was featureless and dank, another solitary moon bear, lots of macaques and many birds (some in tiny cages inside the standard cages).

Visited again in May 1998.

This really is one of the world's worst zoos. It cost 2 yuan to enter the public park and another 4 yuan to enter the zoo.  4 yuan is just under 50 US cents.  None of the animals had water (it was a swelteringly hot, humid day). There was old food and faeces lying everywhere, rats running about. The cages are totally featureless, rusted, broken, slimy and mouldy, decayed and dangerous. Many are unlocked.  All are unsupervised and I observed several children put their hands through the bars of the cages (bears, monkeys, etc). All the visitors - except me - were shouting, laughing and spitting at the animals.

The area is laid out in a rectangle - this is the tally of animals:

On left of entrance:
1 x pony standing in mud.
9 x Cervus timoriensis standing in mud.
2 x Cervus nippon standing in mud.

At left hand end:
2 x Peacocks in a small cage

Side of rectangle opposite entrance:
Row of cages (each about 3mx3m) containing:
2 Domestic Cats, 7 Parrots, 2 Pheasants, 1 Pheasant, 1 "Chrysolophus pictus", 3 Crested Porcupines. 2 empty cages

Row of cages (same size) containing:
1 Python, 3 Coypus, 1 Alligator, 1 empty cage, 1 Bubo bubo, 1 Kestrel

Row of cages (each divided into a front section about 3mx3m and a rear section about the same size - the animals were confined in the rear sections, apparently permanently) containing:
2 Moon Bears, 2 Macaques (labelled "Selenarctos"), 2 Macaca cynomolgus, 1 Moon Bear, 1 empty cage

On right of entrance:
About 35 small tanks containing a variety of fish and turtles - everyone banging on the glass.
Cage 5mx6m containing 2 Macaques
Cage 4mx3m containing 1 Stump-tailed Macaque (masturbating) and 1 Rhesus Macaque in one section and 1 Macaca assamensis in another section.
Cage 3mx3m containing a Sun Bear
Cage 3mx3m containing a Moon Bear
2 empty cages
Several Pheasants.

Visited again in November 1999. No maintenance has been done. Several of the inmates have disappeared. This zoo - with all its inhabitants - is being allowed to rot away.  Disgraceful! The animals should be moved to better facilities and the zoo should then be demolished.

Visited again in August 2003.
It is being demolished.  The animals have been moved to the Golden Bull Ridge Zoo which is also in the awful category but at least there seems to be potential for improvement there.


See Photos.


3. Hainan Crocodile and Safari Park


The following announcement appeared in the China Daily on 12th February 1999: "The largest safari park in China, boasting more than 3,500 crocodiles, has been opened in South China's Hainan Province. More exotic animals are being brought in to stock it. The park covers 144.6 hectares in Chengmai county, 20 kilometres west of Haikou, the provincial capital. It is a Sino-foreign joint venture. The park was built by Li Chuanye, a 47-year-old farmer in Hainan, at a cost of 40 million yuan (US$4.82 million). His partner, Yang Haiquan, a Thailander of Chinese origin, provided the 3,500 crocodiles valued at 50 million yuan (US$6.02 million) as his investment in the venture."

As we were by chance in Haikou on business on 13th February 1999, we took a taxi out to the Park.  It was not yet open and we were obviously the first visitors. Mr Yang was not there but Mr Li was very hospitable and proud to show us his crocodiles. He  told us that it would open on 18th March but, by the appearance, it is likely to be much later. The 3,500 crocodiles are there - no, we didn't count them! But there were certainly thousands. The shops for selling the handbags, shoes, wallets, etc are built but not yet fitted out. The restaurants for serving crocodile meals are built but not yet fitted out. The stadiums for the crocodile shows, the elephant shows and the cock-fighting are not yet finished. There are no animals on site yet apart from the crocodiles. Mr Li's Thai manager, who has three fingers missing from his right hand, said that 4,500Kg of Chicken would be imported weekly from Russia to feed the crocodiles
Hainan Nantai Crocodile Farm & Zoo Limited Company,
17 - 1 Da Ying Road, Haikou City, Hainan Island, Postcode 570206, China.
Tel: + 86 898 6778558 or  + 86 898 748830
Fax: + 86 898 6797989.
Company Motto: "HELP PRESERVE CROCODILES"

Visited again in August 2003.
There appears to have been no further work done since the first visit and the whole place is in a state of decay, although still open to the public (but we were the only visitors).  The only addition we saw is a pair of beautiful white lions in a very insecure looking cage. 

Photos.

4. Haikou Golden Bull Ridge Zoo (Jinniuling Zoo)
Tel: + 86 898 8914837

This is a new zoo opened in late 1998.  There is therefore no excuse for its appallingly low standards. There is no attempt anywhere at enrichment. The animals live singly in plain concrete and iron cages. There is no hope for the inmates.

I visited it in February, November and December 1999. And again in August 2003. And again in December 2004.

1 x elephant
1 x giant panda
2 x lesser pandas
1 x lion
1 x leopard
1 x tiger (with live chicken in its cage)
1 of each of various kinds of foxes, porcupines and civets
various deer, waterfowl, ostrich, peacocks, etc
2 x moon bear
1 x brown bear
1 x kangaroo
1 x camel
1 of each of several breeds of dog
1 x monkey hill
1 x turtle pond
teasing area
photography area
performance area

In November 1999, two terrified wolves had been added in a grossly inadequate cage - serious cruelty!
This really is a heartbreaking zoo. 

This report appeared  in the China Daily 13th December 2001
"Many animals have died after a zoo was closed down because of poor management in Haikou, capital of Hainan Province, reports Sina.com.  Chen Xingguang, Jinniuling Zoo general manager, said the loss-making zoo could not afford enough food and proper accommodation for the animals.  The dead animals include a tiger, a giraffe, two black bears, a camel, seven deer, five white swans and a zebra.  Two cranes and a wild goat had died earlier this year. The zoo was opened in October 1998 and its debts amounted to more than 500,000 yuan (US$60,240.96). "

This zoo is everything that a zoo should not be. The pervasive cruelty is horrible to witness. Pressure needs to be put on the Haikou authorities to make improvements. 
Photos
 

Hengyang, Hunan Province, PRC

Visited in June 1999. Another miserable tribute to humankind's inhumanity.  At least it is a very small zoo.
Yua Ping (Fan Mountain) Public Park. The worst exhibit was a large turtle in a glass box - nowhere for him to move or hide, nothing for him to do. Also horrible was the festering, fly-infested exposed rotting tail-bone of one of the two ostriches (Struthio camelus) - it is unlikely to heal in the hot, humid climate of Hunan's summer.
All the cages were typical Chinese menagerie - minimum size concrete and iron, featureless and depressing. No attempt to do anything except restrain the animals.
The roll call was as follows:
One Heron, one Pigeon + Rabbit, Several Coypus, Four Cervus nippon, Two Ponies (one giving rides), Various Pheasants and Peacocks, One Alligator, One Crocodile, One Moon Bear, One Brown Bear, One Tiger (Panthera, tigris lataica), One Lion.
The standard feed for the animals was rice with a few vegetables.

Hong Kong, SAR, PRC

1. Lai Chi Kok Zoo was one of the world's worst. There was a long but finally successful campaign to have it closed (HK SPCA, Born Free Foundation and others). The decision was hastened by the Government refusing import licences for new animals but was probably mainly the result of the increase in real estate prices. Most of the animals were sent to Xili Lake Wild Animal Park in Shenzhen which on paper before it opened seemed good but unfortunately has been administered with scant regard for the welfare of the inmates - see more on Zoopage 2 under Shenzhen.

2. Zoological and Botanical Gardens.
The Zoo in the Botanical Gardens is by no means the worst in the world and the animals are very well cared for but the site is too small to provide adequate areas for large mammals and birds. There is no alternative suitable site in Hong Kong for a zoo.  A small once beautiful botanic gardens is now a mess of concrete and iron structures housing many miserable creatures. There is a pair of jaguars which are bored out of their minds. The male, in particular, shows severe signs of Zoochosis. The only educational value to the public of observing this suffering is as an example of the inhumanity of man to his fellow creatures. Their children were taken from them and sent to reside in worse conditions in the Guangzhou Zoo (one was subsequently transferred to Nanning Zoo where he died of diarrhoea).  A hideous new cage was built for the bereaved parents at great expense in one of the last tranquil corners of the Gardens. It is unfortunately not sufficiently better to bring any hope of significant alleviation of the animals' plight. It is true that these animals are not capable of being returned to the wild and it is probable that their minds are too far gone to benefit from a more enlightened enclosure (as, for example, in the Singapore Zoo). What I find most shocking is that the animals were not neutered and, therefore, new animals could be born into this grossly deficient scenario. In 1998 the jaguar's pregnancy ended in still birth - but the authorities continued to hope for offspring.
There are also orangutans in a clean but inadequate concrete prison - the 3 females are in constant production and their babies are sent off to other zoos.

Update February 2008.
The male jaguar, fortunately for him, went over the Rainbow Bridge several years ago and it seems that his mate will shortly join him. The authorities (Hong Kong Government Leisure and Cultural Services Department and Agriculture Fisheries and Conservation Department) seem determine to acquire a new pair of jaguars and start a new cycle of suffering. The Hong Kong public who were very fond of the old jaguars have been clearly expressing their opinion that the jaguars should not be replaced but their opinion is likely to be ignored. Breeding endangered species is seen as bringing prestige to the city (never mind that zoo jaguars are not endangered, only their wild cousins and that it is horrifically cruel to confine such an active animal).

3. Ocean Park is very popular in Hong Kong and no one seems aware that there is a problem for the whales and dolphins. Visited many times by us since its opening in 1977.
http://www.oceanpark.com.hk/
Their importation of two of Giant Pandas is a gross example of misuse and exploitation of a national treasure.
We last visited in December 2003 at the request of the management to preview their contact with dolphins programme.
We object to the programme on several grounds:
The principle of using animals for entertainment is wrong.
Capturing wild animals from their natural habitat and imprisoning them is wrong.
Keeping wild animals in small containers is wrong, whether wild caught or captive bred.
Having said that, we have to say that the facilities at Ocean Park are of the highest standard. Since they were built for killer whales, the containers are larger than at most dolphinariums. And the management is very aware of the need for strict hygiene and safety procedures.  The management also genuinely believes in the principle of using captive animals as ambassadors for their species in educational programmes and is not just paying lip service to this idea as in so many institutions.



SCMP FEATURE:
Park's failure to save the whales

by HELEN LUK November 1999
For millions of years, the whales known as "false killer whales" have roamed the deepest and warmest oceans of the Earth. Getting their name from a superficial similarity to the killer whale, these massive five-metre all-black whales live in social groups numbering, at times, into the hundreds. Even at birth they weigh more than a man, and fully grown they can weigh two tonnes.
Male and female, babies and the elderly, live in complex communities communicating by sound, living off squid and fish, occasionally entertaining sailors with displays of water-jumping as dramatic as those of dolphins - despite the whales' much greater size.
Hong Kong's only surviving example of the species Pseudorca crassidens was not quite so lucky. Barney the false killer whale died on October 10 after 12 years in a concrete tank in Ocean Park, reopening the debate about the park's policy on marine animals.
Although the park stresses its care is up to world standards, 100 Cetaceans - which include dolphins and whales - have died in the park since it opened in 1977, according to Suzanne Gendron, Ocean Park's director of zoological operations and education.
Barney died last month. Around mid-September, a few days after Typhoon York, staff noticed he was suffering from a fever. He was not interested in participating in performances, nor did he show much appetite. Blood tests and ultra-sound tests were then taken and indicated a bacterial infection, Ms Gendron said.
Marine mammal specialists in the United States were consulted. Barney's condition fluctuated in the following weeks, even after being treated with anti-microbials. During the last week, a change in the lung pattern was eventually detected and Barney, without apparent pain, died of melioidosis on that Sunday morning.
"As soon as we had an indication of the cause of Barney's death, we tested our cetaceans," said Ms Gendron. "There's no indication that the disease is present in any other of our animals."
The disease melioidosis, which can cause bacterial infections in the blood and the brain and is distinguished by "liquidising" pneumonia that can dissolve the lungs, is not new to Ocean Park. Back in 1976, an outbreak of melioidosis killed at least 33 marine mammals there. University of Hong Kong microbiologist Professor Yuen Kwok-yung, an expert on the disease, said scientists suspected that the outbreak was caused by mud and sand being stirred in the sea during heavy rainstorms, carrying the bacteria into the bay near the park.
The park's practice - of burying the dolphins' corpses near the coast which allowed the bacteria to be washed into th