|
|
 |
|
|
|
David Levitsky,
Ph.D.
Professor of Nutrition and Psychology, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y. |
|
|
|
YES
Vegetarian diets reduce total cholesterol, LDL, and triglycerides. Atherosclerosis can
begin early in life, as we learned from autopsies done on Korean War soldiers.
Today atherosclerotic plaque is beginning in children and is especially pronounced in
African American girls, probably due to poor diet and lack of exercise. Raising children
as vegetarians delays the onset of this process.
Vegetarian children tend to be thinner than meat eaters, a healthy trend in a
country where overweight and inactivity have become the No. 1 public-health problem,
leading to Type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and stroke in middle age.
Some argue that vegetarian children will be calorie-deprived. But malnutrition
only occurs where access to food is also limited. There's little evidence that growth is
retarded in vegetarian children in developed countries.
Similarly, some argue that vegetarian children born to vegan mothers, who eat no
animal products at all, will get insufficient vitamin B12.
But B12 deficiency in vegans is no higher than in the
general population, suggesting there may be sources of B12 other
than meat. It may be seeping into soils from organic fertilizer that's often used on
organic farms, the source of produce for many vegans.
In any case, B12 is easy to provide as a supplement.
Iron deficiency from a vegetarian diet? Our definition of anemia is probably far
too stringent. There's mounting evidence that levels of iron considered normal in the U.S.
may contribute to the development of atherosclerosis.
Starting children on vegetarian diets early will increase the chance that
they'll continue to eat little meat when they are adults, which means they're likely to be
healthier than meat-eating counterparts. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
David Klurfeld,
Ph.D.
Chairman, Department of Nutrition and Food Science, Wayne State University,
Detroit |
|
|
|
NO Children
are picky eaters. They need options, and it's much easier to obtain balance from an
omnivorous diet. Moreover, children need a higher ratio of nutrients to calories than
adults. Broccoli's a fine source of calcium, but you're not going to get a kid
to eat a pound a day, which would be necessary due to low bioavailability. It's also hard
to get sufficient iron, zinc, and vitamins A, D, and B12 from
vegetables.
Women who shun red meat are likely to be deficient in zinc. One would assume the
same to be true for children. Zinc is necessary for growth, immune function, and normal
sexual development, and is a cofactor in a variety of enzymes.
A number of studies, mostly in animals, suggest that children whose diets
exclude elements such as cholesterol and certain fats will grow up unable to induce
sufficient enzymes to handle those foods. Breast milk, the optimal food for infants and
toddlers, is high in fats and cholesterol. Where's the logic in weaning a child of 1 or 2
from breast milk to a low-fat vegetarian diet?
At least two published reports document failure to thrive in children who have
been weaned onto a "low-risk" diet. These involve several dozen children of
upper-middle-class suburbanites, who stopped growing at age 2 or 3.
Recently, it was discovered that conjugated linoleic acid, found in meat and
dairy, seems to reduce body fat, lower cholesterol, and inhibit cancer in a variety of
animals. I don't advocate eating red meat daily, and servings should shrink to the size of
a deck of cards. But just because we consume too much doesn't mean we should run to the
other extreme.
Vegetarians are likely to be poorly informed about nutrition. They'd benefit
from a referral to a registered dietitian. |
|
|
|